Listed from the Own website · Profile updated November 11, 2026
About Badger Creek Kennels
Badger Creek Kennels is an animal trainer based in Wilton, CA who works with dogs and cats. Listed specialties include Dog and cat boarding. This listing comes from the Own website.
Reviews
Reviews come from people who verified their email. Featured placement never changes reviews. Review guidelines
No reviews yet. Worked with Badger Creek Kennels? Be the first to share your experience.
Wilton at a glance
- 4
- trainers listed in Wilton
- 1
- works with dogs
- 1
- lists a credential
- 39
- more within 25 miles
Badger Creek Kennels is one of 4 trainers we list in Wilton, CA.
See all trainers in WiltonWhere Badger Creek Kennels works
Map shows the city this trainer is listed in, not a street address. Contact details are available with Unlimited Access.
Compare with nearby trainers
| Trainer | Location | Distance | Reviews | Animals | Credential listed | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Badger Creek Kennels | Wilton, CA | This profile | Dogs, Cats | No | Unclaimed | |
| WAG, Inc. | Elk Grove, CA | 5.4 miles | Dogs | No | Unclaimed | |
| Juan Portillo | Elk Grove, CA | 5.4 miles | Dogs | No | Unclaimed | |
| The Savitsky Cats | Rancho Cordova, CA | 12.4 miles | Cats | Yes | Unclaimed | |
| Bark Busters - The Central Valley, CA | Acampo, CA | 14.9 miles | Dogs | No | Unclaimed |
Nearby dog trainers
Animals: Dogs
Animals: Dogs
Animals: Cats
- USDA APHIS Animal Welfare Act license (Class C - Exhibitor)
Animals: Dogs
Animals: Dogs, Cats, Horses
- KPA-Professional Training Partner
Animals: Dogs
Questions and answers
Badger Creek Kennels works with dogs and cats. Listed specialties include Dog and cat boarding.
Badger Creek Kennels is listed in Wilton, CA. 39 other trainers are listed within 25 miles.
Phone, email and website details are available with Unlimited Access. Unlimited Access
This profile has not yet been claimed by the trainer. Trainers can claim their profile for free. Claim your profile
Keep looking
See something wrong? Request a correction.
